Patent, Design and Trademark Registrar Decisions
Here is a collection of decisions by the Patent, Design and Trademark Registrar as published by the Registrar:
Decision regarding opposition to patent application No. 151085 dated January 18, 2012 The background to the application is an opposition proceeding to a request to amend the specification of a patent application. The opponent’s summaries were submitted on 14.8.11 and the patent applicant’s summaries were submitted on 13.9.11. On 27.9.11, reply summaries were submitted on behalf of the opponent.
Decision regarding opposition to patent application No. 146526 dated January 15, 2012 The decision is regarding a request to delete parts of the opponent’s affidavit to the patent application. This is a patent application that was first published for oppositions on 5.10.2006.
Decision regarding opposition to trademark registration 205879 “MISS SEXY” dated July 26, 2011 The decision is regarding oppositions to the trademark registration application “MISS SEXY” requested by Iris Line Ltd. and Fronsac TM S.A., owner of the trademark “MISS SIXTY,” filed an opposition to the application.
Decision regarding opposition to patent applications 143607, 143611, 143612, 143613, 143619 dated May 23, 2011 The decision is regarding six oppositions to patent registration applications. These applications are related to each other and refer to processes and intermediates for preparing the substance Fexofenadine, the active ingredient in a drug that is the result of the respondent’s development.
Decision regarding opposition to patent application 112311 dated April 28, 2011 The decision is regarding a patent application for a dripper structure, as part of an irrigation system. The subject of the application is flow control units located inside and along a water-carrying pipe, whose purpose is to perform water emission at fixed points along the pipe through controlled dripping.
Decision regarding application to cancel patent 115045 and opposition to patent applications 123384, 12454 dated April 28, 2011 The patents concern armor plates designed to protect against impacts of various (ballistic) threats, composed of an array of ceramic components organized together in one layer and consolidated using a consolidating material that is elastic.
Decision regarding competing applications for trademark registration 197103, 198634, 198635 dated April 28, 2011 The decision is regarding competing applications for trademark registration. The applications are based on the name Jerusalem Winery in English. Applicant 1 petitioned for registration of trademark No. 197193 Jerusalem winery (not designed), in class 33 for “alcoholic beverages.” Applicant 2 is the owner of trademark registration applications No. 198634 and 198635. Mark No. 198634 was filed for registration in class 32 for – non-alcoholic beverages including fruit juices and grape juice all included in class 32, and mark No. 198634 was filed for registration in class 33 for wines, grape-based beverages, by-product of wine production process and grape-based beverages, liqueurs and other alcoholic beverages all included in class 33.
Decision regarding opposition to patent application 118619 dated April 27, 2011 Decision regarding a patent application for a tracking system, based on two sensors, whose purpose is to identify and track shooting events in a given area cell.
Decision regarding application for trademark registration 174765-6 dated April 27, 2011 Decision regarding 2 applications for trademark registration. The marks (sight or scope figures) were requested for registration in class 9 “telescopic rifle scopes, all included in class 9.”
Decision regarding application for trademark registration 174402 dated April 13, 2011 The requested mark is a three-dimensional figure of a beverage bottle. The name of the beverage marketed in the requested bottle is “Crown Royal” and in Hebrew – royal crown. A look at the developments and reliefs on the bottle will teach that these are designed to give it the appearance of a crown.
Decision regarding application for trademark registration 200689-90 dated April 13, 2011 Regarding registration of trademarks composed of three-dimensional contour lines of bottles and containers. Application for registration of 2 three-dimensional trademarks submitted by L’Oreal company for registration in class 3 for: “perfume, eau de toilette, body lotion, aftershave; gels and lotions for bath and shower not for medical purposes; toilet soaps, deodorants; all included in class 3.”
Decision regarding application for trademark registration 210043 dated April 13, 2011 Application for registration of a three-dimensional trademark. The mark was filed for registration by The Procter & Gamble Company and was requested for registration in class 3 “soaps, perfumes, essential oil extracts, cosmetics, hair creams, preparations for cleaning, care, treatment and beautification of skin, scalp and hair, hair styling products, hair variety preparations, bleaching and dyeing; all included in class 3.”
Decision regarding application for trademark registration 195184 dated April 13, 2011 Application for registration of a three-dimensional trademark. The mark was filed for registration by Martell & Co company and was requested for registration in class 33 “alcoholic beverages (except beer); all included in class 33.”
Decision regarding application to cancel registered design No. 31007 dated April 4, 2011 Decision regarding the application of Agmon – Company for Production of Rubber and Plastic Products Ltd. regarding “rubber seal for aluminum profiles,” used mainly for sealing safe room windows.
Decision regarding patent application No. 147642 dated March 30, 2011 The application is regarding an invention related to a substance called tadalafil, used as the active substance for a drug for treating male erectile dysfunction. The invention constitutes a solution to the solubility problem of tadalafil.
Decision regarding opposition to patent application No. 153109 – cost ruling dated March 29, 2011 This is an application for patent registration for a pharmaceutical preparation for inhibiting bone breakdown in humans.
Decision regarding opposition to trademark registration 197349 dated March 13, 2011 Decision regarding the application for trademark registration TIGRIS (designed), submitted by City Wash Ltd. in class 25 for footwear, clothing and headwear. Puma AG filed an opposition to the application claiming that the requested mark may mislead the public to think that the applicant’s goods originate from the opponent, lead to dilution of the opponent’s marks, and cause unfair competition.
Decision regarding application for trademark registration No. 203321-25 “ALEXANDRIA=HEALTH SCIENCE” dated February 24, 2011 The application is for registration of five trademarks by Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Decision regarding application to restore validity of design No. 40394 dated February 3, 2011 The application discusses the matter of restoring validity of an expired design.
Decision regarding opposition to patent application No. 149249 dated January 31, 2011 Opposition by the Israeli Internet Association to a patent application by KI KI SEOK KIM, U.S.A and JIYUL YOO, U.S.A.
